Phytotechnical performance and selection of 15 introduced lines of Lathyrus sativus L. in Jauja, Junín
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21704/ac.v83i1.1886Keywords:
adaptation, line input, ground pea, Lathyrus sativus L., grass peaAbstract
Fifteen lines of Lathyrus sativus L. introduced from ICARDA Syria, and a local control in the 2018 and 2019 agricultural campaigns at the El Mantaro Experimental Station, of the National University of Central Peru in Jauja, Junín, located at an altitude of 3,300 meters above sea level with the objective of evaluating the yield of dry grain and its morphological and physiological components of the lines under spring-summer sowing in dry conditions. The lines that stood out in grain yield greater than 700 kg/ha, with pods 4 cm long, more than 100 pods per plant, greater than two grains per pod and weight of 100 seeds greater than 20 g, were the local control. T16, followed by lines L3556 and L3030. While the L3556 line was precocious with 63 days to flowering and 180 days to physiological maturity. The improved lines of Lathyrus in the environment of average temperature of 13.04 °C, a relative humidity of 57.2 % and a rainfall of 667.2 mm had a good performance, earliness and can be evaluated in marginal lands of the Andean zone for being a genetic reservoir. that will increase the genetic variability of the ground pea that is grown as an underutilized crop in the Sierra de Ancash to buffer against climate change.
Downloads
References
• Ahmed, B., Sultana, M., Karim, M. R., Halder, T., & Rahman, M. M. (2014). Screening of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) genotypes against salinity. Intl. J. Bio. Res. 17, 48–54.
• Das, A., Parihar, A.K., Barpete, S., Kumar, S., & Gupta, S. (2021). Current Perspectives on Reducing the β-ODAP Content and Improving Potential Agronomic Traits in Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 12:703275. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.703275
• Flores, O., Gutiérrez, L., & Palomo, R. (2007). Revista científica sobre Veza común y Lathyrus sativus L. Alternativas para producir Forraje en Zacatecas. Folleto Nº 13. Campo experimental Zacatecas – México. 34 Pp.
• Hanbury, C.D., White, C.L., Mullan, B.P., & Siddique, K.H.M. (2000). A review of the potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. grain for use as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 87 (1/2): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00186-3
• Lazo, A. (2011). Adaptación de Genotipos de (Lathyrus Sativus L.) introducidos del Icarda-Siria para grano en condiciones de la E.E.A. El Mantaro. Uncp.edu.pe. https://doi.org/TESIS-361.pdf.
• Krarup, H.A. (2002). Blanco Austral, cultivar de chícharo (Lathyrus sativus l.) Obtenido por selección del rendimiento por planta y de sus componentes. Agro Sur, 30(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.4206/agrosur.2002.v30n1-05.
• Kuo YH, Ikegami F., & Lambein F. (1998). Metabolic routes of beta (isoxazolin 5 –on-2-y1)-L alanine (BIA), the precursor of the neurotoxin ODAP (beta –N-oxalyl-L-alpha, beta, diaminopropionic acid), in different legume seedlings, Phytochemistry 49:43-48.
• Ministerio del Ambiente. (2021). El Sistema Nacional de Información Ambiental (INIA). ¿Por qué el Perú es el tercer país más vulnerable al cambio climático?.
• Senamhi. (2018). Registros de las variables climáticas en Huaraz, campaña agrícola 2017/2018. Estación Meteorológica Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo en Huaraz.
• Tsegaye, D., Lady W., & Bayab@ M. (2005). Perfæmance of græs pea (Lathyrus satnø L) somæłor›es at Adet Northwest Ethiqsia. čatthjms £ațyróm HeaeJèi/ezs, 4, pp: 5-6.
• Tekele-Haimanot, R., Abegaz, B., Wuhib, E., Kassina, A., Kidane, Y., Kebe, N., Alemu, T., & Spencer P.S. (1993). Nutritional and neuro-toxicological surveys of Lathyrus sativus consumption in northern Ethiopia. Pp. 41-45 in Lathyrus sativus and Human Lathyrism: Progress and Prospects (HKM Yusuf and F. Lambein, Eds.) Proc. 2nd Int. Colloq. Lathyrus/Lathyrism, Dhaka, 10-12 December 1993. University of Dhaka.
• Ulloa, P., & Mera, M. (2010). Inheritance of Seed Weight in Large-Seed Grass Pea Lathyrus sativus L. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 70(3):357-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392010000300002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Felix. Camarena, Doris Marmolejo, Amelia Huaringa, Celso Gonzales, Elvia Mostacero de Bustillos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.