PROPOSAL FOR AN INDEX OF ECOHYDROLOGICAL THREATS FOR THE HYDROGRAPHIC UNITS OF PERU, APPLIED TO THE PISCO RIVER BASIN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v22i2.2085

Keywords:

index, threats, ecohydrology, Pisco, sub-basin, aquatic ecosystems, IWRM, GIS

Abstract

In this research, an "Ecohydrological Threat Index - IAEH" is proposed, which consists of the integration of nine indicators, grouped into two themes: hydrological and biotic, selected considering two criteria: i) the relevance of the negative impacts that they can generate in the aquatic ecosystems of the basin and ii) the availability of free data that exists for its implementation at the national level. The calculation of the nine aforementioned indicators was carried out within a Geographic Information System (GIS) and they are statistically standardized in order to obtain a relative value of the index for each sub-basin analyzed. The IAEH was applied in the Pisco River basin, Peru, and it was determined that from the nine sub-basins evaluated, one sub-basin is classified in the range of moderate threat, three sub-basins in low to moderate threat and five sub- basins in low threat. The information generated is extremely important, since it allows to rank the level of relative threats to the aquatic ecosystems of each sub-basin (rivers, lakes and wetlands) to be ranked in a hierarchy, and in this sense, it is an alternative to carry out a rapid and low-level evaluation. demand for resources, which can be applied in other basins of the country, particularly in basins where the aforementioned information is limited, offering a tool for the prioritization of policies related to the conservation and protection of water resources and aquatic ecosystems, in aspects such as the determination of ecological flows, marginal strips, water resources protection zones and headwaters basins.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANA. 2012. Delimitación y codificación de Unidades Hidrográficas del Perú: Memoria Descriptiva.

ANA (Autoridad Nacional del Agua). Lima, Perú. https://repositorio.ana.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12543/597.

ANA. 2016. Priorización de cuencas para la gestión de los recursos hídricos. ANA (Autoridad Nacional del Agua). Lima, Perú. https://repositorio.ana.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12543/205.

ANA. 2019. Resolución Jefatural Nº 267-2019-ANA: Lineamientos Generales para Determinar Caudales Ecológicos. Viernes 06 de diciembre de 2019. El Peruano, XXXVI(1517): 8-9. Lima, Perú. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/download/url/aprueban-los-lineamientos-generales-para-determinar-caudale-resolucion-jefatural-n-267-2019-ana-1834265-1.

ANA. 2022. Implementación del Modelo SWAT en la Cuenca del Rio Pisco. ANA (Autoridad Nacional del Agua). Lima, Perú. https://repositorio.ana.gob.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12543/5209/ANA0003719.pdf_1?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

ANA. s.f. Visor por Cuencas. ANA (Autoridad Nacional del Agua). Lima, Perú. Consultado el 03 de noviembre de 2023 de: https://snirh.ana.gob.pe/VisorPorCuenca/.

Dickens C., Smakhtin V., Biancalani, R., Villholth K.G., Eriyagama N. & Marinelli M. 2019. Incorporating environmental flows into water stress indicator 6.4.2: guidelines for a minimum standard method for global reporting. SDG 6.4 MONITORING SUSTAINABLE USE OF WATER RESOURCES PAPERS. FAO Rome, Italy.

Falkenmark M. & Widstrand C. 1992. Population and Water Resources: A Delicate Balance. Population Bulletin, Vol. 47, No. 3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11109640_Population_and_Water_Resources_A_Delicate_Balance.

Hughes D.A. & Hannart P. 2003. A desktop model used to provide an initial estimate of the ecological instream flow requirements of rivers in South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 270(3-4): 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00290-1.

Hughes D.A. & Münster F. 2000. Hydrological information and techniques to support the determination of the water quantity component of the ecological reserve. Institute for Water Research Rhodes University Grahamstown South Africa (IWR Report No. 3/2000). Report to the Water Research Commission (Report TT 137/00). Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/TT-137-00.pdf.

INEI. 2017. Sistema de Información Geográfica. Sistema de Consulta de Centros Poblados. [Actualizado a la información censal del 2017]. INEI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática). Lima, Perú. http://sige.inei.gob.pe/test/atlas/.

King J. M.; Tharme R. & de Villiers M. (Eds). 2008. Environmental Flow Assessments for Rivers: Manual for the Building Block Methodology (updated Edition). Report to the Water Research Commission by Freshwater Research Unit University of Cape Town. WRC Report No TT 354/08. https://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/TT%20354-CONSERVATION.pdf.

LePrieur F., Beauchard O., Blanchet S., Oberdorff T. & Brosse S. 2008. Fish Invasions in the World's River Systems: When Natural Processes Are Blurred by Human Activities. PLoS Biology, 6(2): e28: 0404-0410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060028.

MIDAGRI. s.f. Sistema de Información Agrícola y Pecuaria. MIDAGRI (Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego). Lima, Perú. Consultado el 03 de noviembre de 2023 de: https://siea.midagri.gob.pe/portal/informativos/superficie-agricola-peruana.

MINEDU. 2020. Descarga de Información Espacial del MED. [Actualizado al 05/02/2020]. MINEDU (Ministerio de Educación). Lima, Perú. https://sigmed.minedu.gob.pe/descargas/.

Moore B.C., Coleman A.M., Wigmosta M.S., Skaggs R.L. & Venteris E.R. 2015. A high spatiotemporal assessment of consumptive water use and water scarcity in the conterminous United States. Water Resources Management, 29: 5185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1112-x.

MTC. 2023 Descarga de datos espaciales. [Actualizado al martes, 29 agosto 2023]. MTC (Ministerio de Transporte y Comunicaciones). Lima, Perú. https://portal.mtc.gob.pe/estadisticas/descarga.html.

Ortega H., Hidalgo M., Correa E., Espino J., Chocano L., Trevejo G., Meza-Vargas V., Cortijo A. & Quispe R. 2012. Lista anotada de los peces de aguas continentales del Perú: Estado actual del conocimiento, distribución, usos y aspectos de conservación. Segunda edición. Ministerio del Ambiente y Museo de Historia Natural, UNMSM,Lima. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314230837_Lista_anotada_de_los_peces_de_aguas_continentales_del_Peru_Estado_actual_del_conocimiento_distribucion_uso s_y_aspectos_de_conservacion.

Poff N., Tharme R. & Arthington A. 2017. Evolution of Environmental Flows Assessment Science, Principles, and Methodologies. In: Horne A.C., Angus Webb J., Stewardson M.J., Richter B. & Acreman M. Water for the Environment. from Policy and Science to Implementation and Management. 203-236. Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803907-6.00011-5.

Pringle C. 2003. What is hydrologic connectivity and why is it ecologically important? Hydrol. Process., 17(13): 2685- 2689. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5145.

PRODUCE. s.f. Catastro Acuícola Nacional. PRODUCE (Ministerio de la Producción). Lima, Perú. Consultado el 03 de noviembre de 2023 de: http://catastroacuicola.produce.gob.pe/web/.

Sánchez E. & Quinteros Z. 2017. Pertinencia del concepto de Estándar de Calidad Ambiental (Eca) en la gestión de sistemas ambientales con varios estados alternativos. Estudio de caso de una experiencia peruana. Ecología Aplicada, 16(2), 151-164. https://dx.doi.org/10.21704/rea.v16i2.1019.

Smakhtin V. & Anputhas M. 2006. An assessment of environmental flow requirements of Indian river basins. Research Report 107 of the International Water Management Institute. http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB107/RR107.pdf.

Smakhtin V., Arunachalam M., Behera S., Chatterjee A., Das S., Gautam P., Joshi G.D., Sivaramakrishnan K.G. & Unni K.S. 2007. Developing procedures for assessment of ecological status of Indian river basins in the context of environmental water requirements. IWMI Research Report 114. International Water Management Institute. Colombo, Sri Lanka. https://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB114/RR114.pdf.

Sood A., Smakhtin V., Eriyagama N., Villholth K.G., Liyanage N., Wada Y. , Ebrahim G. & Dickens C. 2017. Global environmental flow information for the sustainable development goals. International Water Management Institute (IWMI). (IWMI Research Report 168). Colombo, Sri Lanka. DOI: 10.5337/2017.201.

Templeton G.F. 2011. A Two-Step Approach for Transforming Continuous Variables to Normal: Implications and Recommendations for IS Research. CAIS (Communications of the Association for Information Systems), 28: Article 4: 41-58. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02804.

UNEP-DHI & UNEP. 2016. Transboundary River Basins: Status and Trends. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi.

Vörösmarty C., Sharma K.K., Fekete B.M., Copeland A.H., Holden J., Marble J.C. & Lough J.A. 1997. The storage and aging of continental runoff in large reservoir systems of the world. Ambio, 26(4): 210-219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314590.

Vörösmarty C.J., McIntyre P.B., Gessner M.O., Dudgeon D., Prussevitch A., Green P., Glidden S., Bunn S.E., Sullivan C.A., Liermann C.R. & Davies P.M. 2010. Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity. Nature, 467:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

Issue

Section

Artículos originales

How to Cite

Garcia Gonzales, E., & Tam Málaga, J. (2023). PROPOSAL FOR AN INDEX OF ECOHYDROLOGICAL THREATS FOR THE HYDROGRAPHIC UNITS OF PERU, APPLIED TO THE PISCO RIVER BASIN. Ecología Aplicada, 22(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v22i2.2085

Most read articles by the same author(s)