Evaluation format

Tierra Nuestra journal

ISSN 2519-738X

Evaluation format

Tierra Nuestra is a publication of an academic nature, edited by the Department of Human Sciences of the Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, which aims to disseminate the intellectual production of national and international professors and researchers in the different thematic areas of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, which are submitted to arbitration and peer review. The articles submitted for publication are original, as they have not been published in any other media and will not be and have not been submitted for publication in any other media.

Referee data

First and last names:

Haga clic aquí para escribir texto.

Institution to which you are linked:

Haga clic aquí para escribir texto.

City/Country:

Haga clic aquí para escribir texto.

Name of the text to be evaluated:

Haga clic aquí para escribir una fecha.

Date of editorial evaluation:

Haga clic aquí para escribir texto.
  1. EDITORIAL EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE

CRITERIA

Yes

NO

Is the text within the editorial-thematic line of the journal?

 

 

COMMENT:

Is the document original?

 

 

COMMENTS (if the answer is no, please indicate if you have evidence of plagiarism, fragments or sections previously published by the same author, complete or similar versions already published):

Is the title clear in expressing the purpose of the text and does it correspond to the topic developed?

 

 

COMMENT:

Does the article make an original and novel contribution in relation to the area of knowledge to which it is linked?

 

 

COMMENT:

Does the article follow the journal's citation style (APA 7th edition)?

 

 

COMMENT:

Does the article have sufficient, updated, and relevant bibliographic support?

 

 

COMMENT:

Should spelling, syntax, or other aspects related to writing quality be corrected?

 

 

COMMENT:

Does the article have a relevant structure and does it comply with the content proposed in the abstract and introduction?

 

 

COMMENT:

 

  1. CONCEPT

Mark with an "X" the decision on the text:

Approved for publication without corrections

 

Approved for publication with corrections*

 

Not viable for publication

 

*If this is the case, you should note the corrections to be made by the author in the comments to be sent to the author.

COMMENTS TO SEND TO THE AUTHOR

 

 

COMMENTS FOR THE EDITOR