Power and gender relations in urban agriculture projects in South Lima: A critical analysis of community participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21704/ac.v85i2.928Keywords:
Urban agriculture, power relations , domination, food security, social inclusion, gender, urban development, community participation, South LimaAbstract
This article presents the findings of a doctoral research study focused on power relations within urban agriculture (UA) projects in three low-income neighborhoods in South Lima. The research emerges within a social context marked by deep socioeconomic inequalities and a history of internal migration. Although these projects are framed with objectives of food security, social inclusion, and empowerment, the findings reveal that they often mask asymmetric power relations that impact the residents of these areas, especially the gardeners, who are mostly women. Using a methodological approach that combines critical discourse analysis and deep hermeneutics, the study explores power dynamics among promoting organizations, community leaders, and participants. It is identified that, far from empowering the gardeners, these projects reinforce preexisting inequalities, perpetuating gender hierarchies and structures of subordination that limit their participation and agency. The interactions among the various actors reflect a paternalism that disregards the lived realities of the gardeners, who, by accepting imposed directives, reproduce discourses that do not reflect their everyday experiences. The gardeners’ self-devaluation and deference towards promoters demonstrate how structural prejudices and inequalities shape these dynamics. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for a critical review of UA discourses to achieve genuine empowerment and social transformation within South Lima communities.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1990). La distinction : Critique sociale du jugement. Minuit.
De Zeeuw, H., & Dreschel, P. (Eds.). (2015). The role of urban agriculture in the urban food system. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 29, 1–36.
Doré, E., & Matta, R. (2011). L’andinité à Lima. Civilisations, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/civilisations.2675
Fairclough, N. (2023). Language and power: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1975). Vigilar y castigar: Nacimiento de la prisión. Siglo XXI Editores.
Foucault, M. (1995). La microfísica del poder. Siglo XXI.
Giddens, A. (2000). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.
Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender, empowerment, and the state: The politics of participation. Feminist Economics, 22(4), 12–35.
McMichael, P. (2009). A food system perspective on agriculture and development. Food Security, 1(2), 171–187.
Martucelli, D. (2004). Figures de domination. Armand Colin.
Martucelli, D. (2006). La société en devenir. Armand Colin.
Matos Mar, R. (1984). El asentamiento humano en Lima: Estructuras sociales y económicas. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 14, 33–45.
Miller, T. (2018). Power relations in urban agriculture projects. Urban Agriculture Review, 22(2), 101–120.
Patel, R. (2021). Gender dynamics and community engagement in urban agriculture. Journal of Social Issues, 40(1), 45–63.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
Silva, F., & Ramirez, M. (2018). Urban agriculture and social inclusion: An analysis of participatory processes in Lima’s informal settlements. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(3), 440–460.
Smit, W., Nasr, J., & Kremer, J. (2001). Urban agriculture for sustainable cities: A review. In The role of urban agriculture in sustainable urban development (pp. 1–9). United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
Smith, J. (2020). Urban agriculture and power dynamics. Journal of Urban Studies, 45(3), 234–256.
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: Critical theory and the philosophy of the social sciences. Stanford University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2019). Power and inequality in urban development. Sociology of Development, 26(3), 340–359.
Zezza, A., & Tasciotti, L. (2010). Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: Empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries. Food Policy, 35(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.03.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Luis Enrique Serrano Ayasta, Josiane Stoessel-Ritz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.